| |
The Dawn of a New Oil Era?
China is the world's second-largest consumer of oil.
It has about 20 million cars and trucks now. By the
year 2020, that may be 120 million.
By Robert J. Samuelson
Newsweek
April 4
issue - The interesting question about the advent of
$50-a-barrel oil is whether it signals a new era in
the economics and politics of energy. To sharpen the
question: have we entered a period when, owing to
consistently strong demand and chronically scarce
supplies, prices have moved permanently higher? We
don't know, but the answer could be "yes" for at
least one reason: China.
Americans
consume almost 21 million barrels of oil a day, a
quarter of the world total of 84 million barrels a
day, reports the International Energy Agency. But
China is now second at 6.4 million barrels a day,
and its demand could double by 2020, various
analysts told a conference held last week by the
Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS)
in Washington. Moreover, China will import most of
its new needs; its domestic output is steady at
about 3.5 million barrels a day. It's unclear how
much China's extra demand—and that of other
developing countries, especially India—will
stimulate extra oil production.
Oil markets
do undergo seismic shifts. Until 1974, the United
States was the world's largest oil producer.
Supplies were plentiful; Americans controlled their
own oil prices, as Daniel Yergin explained in his
1991 book "The Prize." With surplus production
capacity, the Texas Railroad Commission—which,
despite its name, regulated oil—limited output to
stabilize prices while maintaining a "security
reserve" for times of crisis, wrote Yergin. In March
1971, the commission allowed all-out production to
meet rising demand. America's oil surplus had
vanished. Worldwide prices rose, and OPEC (the
Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries)
became more powerful.
We could now
be at a similar inflection point, where the global
oil system changes dramatically. Certainly the
short-term outlook already has. From 1991 to 1999,
world oil demand rose annually about 1 million
barrels a day, Guy Caruso, head of the U.S. Energy
Information Administration, told the CSIS
conference. But in 2004, demand unexpectedly jumped
2.7 million barrels a day. A third of the increase
came from China, and much of that reflected
electricity shortages. Unable to get reliable power,
factories installed their own generators. China's
regular power plants overwhelmingly use coal, but
the new generators used imported diesel fuel. China
could solve this problem by building more power
plants and easing rail bottlenecks that hinder coal
shipments. But there will still be new sources of
oil demand. China now has about 20 million cars and
trucks, energy consultant James Dorian said; by
2020, it could have 120 million. (In 2001, the
United States had about 230 million cars, vans and
trucks.)
Higher oil
demand has now strained the global production system
to its limits. Spare capacity of about 1.5 million
barrels a day is the lowest in 30 years, said CSIS's
Frank Verrastro. Most is located in Saudi Arabia.
Higher prices partly reflect fear of more supply
disruptions—from terrorism, war, political
upheavals, weather or accidents. In theory, higher
prices should be partially self-correcting. They
should dampen demand and encourage supply. But
theory must always be revised for new realities.
Here, there are two.
One is that
in rich countries—notably the United States—rising
incomes make it easier to afford higher energy
prices. In the latest month, American oil demand was
actually up 2 percent from a year earlier (and, yes,
adjusted for inflation, today's gasoline prices are
still roughly a third below levels reached in 1980
and 1981). A second reality is that big oil
companies seem less willing or able to find new oil.
A study by Credit Suisse First Boston reports that
major companies have replaced more than half their
depleted oil reserves by buying reserves from other
companies or re-estimating existing reserves. In
1990, companies replaced two thirds of reserves with
new discoveries. The poor performance may partly
reflect the fact that 72 percent of the world's oil
reserves are controlled by state-owned oil
companies, says Verrastro. Private companies can
often get exploration rights only on terms that
involve (to them) too much risk and too little
profit.
Anything
could now happen to oil. Prices could drop, if the
immediate fears behind today's buying don't
materialize. But the long-term trends are
unpromising. Global demand is rising inexorably;
global supply seems less expansive. Dependence on
precarious Persian Gulf oil will probably increase.
The global economy remains hostage to uncertain or
expensive fuel. Producing countries may become
stronger, consuming countries weaker. There may be
more competition among consuming nations to secure
long-term supply contracts. China has already made a
few such deals.
The message
for Americans is simple. We import nearly 60 percent
of our oil. We can't any time soon eliminate
imports, but we could limit them by producing more
at home and conserving more (meaning higher fuel
taxes, tougher gasoline standards, smaller vehicles
and more hybrid engines). That would lessen our own
vulnerability and ease pressures for the rest of the
world. The debate that pits greater production
against greater conservation is wrong. We need both.
© 2005 Newsweek, Inc.
|